Individual & Population Health

Randomized crossover clinical studies to assess abuse liability and nicotine pharmacokinetics of Velo Oral Nicotine pouches

Oral nicotine pouches (ONPs) are a newer category of smokeless tobacco products containing pharmaceutical-grade nicotine but no tobacco leaf. These products have the potential to help smokers transition away from cigarettes. To assess their potential role as alternatives to cigarettes, we evaluated the abuse liability (AL) of Velo ONPs with varying nicotine content (4–12 mg per pouch), pouch size (600 mg or 400 mg) and flavor (six varieties) in comparison to high (cigarettes) and low (nicotine replacement therapy [NRT] gum) AL comparators.

Assessment of Abuse Liability and Nicotine Pharmacokinetics of glo Heated Tobacco Products in a Randomized, Crossover Study

This study aimed to assess the AL of glo HTPs, operated in either Standard or Boost Modes, compared with high- and low-AL comparators (subjects’ usual brand cigarettes and nicotine gum, respectively).

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between e-cigarette use among non-tobacco users and initiating smoking of combustible cigarettes

Purchase Intent and Intended Use of the glo Heated Tobacco Product

This study assessed current cigarette smokers' interest in using the gloTM heated tobacco product (HTP), whether those interested are likely to quit or greatly reduce their cigarette consumption, and whether never tobacco users are interested in the glo HTP.

A systematic review investigating associations between e-cigarette use among former cigarette smokers and relapse to smoking cigarettes

As e-cigarette use has steadily increased over the recent years, the public health interest in the potential implications of e-cigarette use on cigarette smoking has grown in parallel. With strict adherence to PRISMA guidelines, this systematic review examined the potential associations between e-cigarette use and relapse to cigarette smoking among former cigarette smokers.

Abuse liability of two electronic nicotine delivery systems compared with combustible cigarettes and nicotine gum from an open-label randomized crossover study

An assessment of the likelihood of use and abuse potential for new tobacco products is an important part of tobacco product regulation in the United States and abroad. This paper reports the results of a randomized, open-label, crossover clinical study that assessed factors related to product adoption and abuse liability (AL), comparing two closed electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) products to combustible cigarettes and nicotine gum, high- and low-AL comparator products, respectively.

Purchase Intent and Product Appeal of Velo Nicotine Pouches Among Current Tobacco Users and Nonusers of Tobacco

Oxidative Stress and Lung Fibrosis: Towards an Adverse Outcome Pathway

Changes in Biomarkers of Exposure and Potential Harm in Smokers Switched to Vuse Vibe or Vuse Ciro Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems